It can, if each proposal’s facts and current status are clear.
Avoid a blended account
Label the employer, duties and ownership for each. Do not combine the strongest elements into an arrangement that neither proposal actually offers.
Hypothetical example: a museum conservator whose prospective employer changes the project from paper archives to laboratory treatment. Keep the offer letter, duty schedule, résumé, degree records, and any licence evidence in the same factual version. Ask the employer to identify the worksite, supervisor, compensation, and why the position calls for this profession. A first file review normally flags name variations, incomplete translations, unsupported experience, and letters signed by someone unable to describe the work. The useful decision is whether to request a corrected employer record or postpone the presentation until the professional case is coherent. The final comparison should state which Appendix 2 profession is claimed, which qualification alternative applies, and whether any destination licence is required before practice. Keep citizenship proof separate from the credential record. If a customer document identifies a different supervisor or end date, ask the employer and customer for an accurate explanation rather than selecting the more convenient version. Record ownership and payment facts as well, because an applicant-controlled U.S. arrangement can be prohibited self-employment even when the technical duties look professional. Once the discrepancies are resolved, choose the Canadian inspection request or employer-filed I-129 process that fits the actual arrangement and retain the complete version used.